COMPARISON
Full comparison of BMW 520d xDrive and Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE: specifications, prices, performance and verdict.
| BMW 520d xDrive | Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 HP | 831 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 1400 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3 s | 2.9 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h | 315 km/h |
| Price | 58.900 EUR | 180.000 EUR |
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |
| CO2 (WLTP) | 140 g/km | 265 g/km |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Trunk | 520 L | 382 L |
| Reliability | 8.5/10 | 8/10 |
| Battery | — | 14.8 kWh |
| Electric range | — | 40 km |
| BMW 520d xDrive | Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | |
|---|---|---|
| Insurance | €2000 | €2700 |
| MOT | €400 | €1167 |
| Maintenance | €450 | €1200 |
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |
| Fuel/year | €1391 | €3019 |
| Total/year | €5010 | €8867 |
| Reliability | 8.5/10 | 8/10 |
| BMW 520d xDrive | Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5060 mm | 4725 mm |
| Width | 1900 mm | 1985 mm |
| Height | 1515 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2995 mm | 2630 mm |
| Weight | 1905 kg | 2000 kg |
| Trunk (seats up) | 520 L | 382 L |
| Fuel tank | 68 L | 80 L |
Practical summary based on the two chosen models
BMW 520d xDrive: Daily use
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE: Performance and luxury
AWD vs AWD
5 vs 4
BMW 520d xDrive saves ~€1628/year in fuel (15,000 km).
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE costs €121.100 more in purchase price.
BMW 520d xDrive: €2450/year · Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE: €3900/year (without fuel).
Detailed comparison between BMW 520d xDrive and Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE.
| BMW 520d xDrive | Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | |
|---|---|---|
| City | 6.2 L/100km | 14.5 L/100km |
| Highway | 4.8 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
| Combined | 5.3 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |
| Calm driving | 4.5 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
| Sport driving | 7 L/100km | 18 L/100km |
| City range | 968 km | 552 km |
| Highway range | 1250 km | 842 km |
| BMW 520d xDrive | Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | |
|---|---|---|
| After 1 year | €47.120 (80%) | €144.000 (80%) |
| After 3 years | €40.052 (68%) | €122.400 (68%) |
| After 5 years | €31.806 (54%) | €97.200 (54%) |
High-grade upholstery, wood and aluminium in a sober, well-assembled cabin.
Seats with lateral bolstering, electric adjustment and heating for driver and passenger.
LED strips along the dashboard and doors with several selectable tones.
Projection of speed, navigation and assistance on the windshield.
Premium audio system with 16 speakers and surround sound.
Independent temperature control for driver, passenger and rear seats.
Curved touchscreen with voice control, navigation and full connectivity.
56-inch screen that blends instrument, central and passenger displays under a curved glass.
Integrated lateral support and electric adjustments with memory, heating and ventilation.
15-speaker high-fidelity surround sound system.
delivers 831 HP and estimated total cost €6919/year (fuel + insurance + maintenance).
View full review
Stay up to date with the latest news about Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE: launches, updates, market trends and expert analysis.
BMW 520d xDrive usually has better long-term mechanical reliability.
BMW 520d xDrive consumes less fuel than the Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE.
BMW 520d xDrive is more comfortable for long trips.
BMW 520d xDrive vs Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE: comparison of power, acceleration, price and fuel economy to help you decide.
