COMPARISON
Full comparison of Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE and Tesla Model S Plaid: specifications, prices, performance and verdict.
| Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | Tesla Model S Plaid | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 831 HP | 1020 HP |
| Torque | 1400 Nm | 1420 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9 s | 2.1 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h | 322 km/h |
| Price | 180.000 EUR | 129.990 EUR |
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100km | 15.7 kWh/100km |
| CO2 (WLTP) | 265 g/km | — |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Trunk | 382 L | 793 L |
| Reliability | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Battery | 14.8 kWh | 100 kWh |
| Electric range | 40 km | 611 km |
| Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | Tesla Model S Plaid | |
|---|---|---|
| Insurance | €2700 | €2000 |
| MOT | €1167 | €400 |
| Maintenance | €1200 | €350 |
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100km | 15.7 kWh/100km |
| Fuel/year | €3019 | €707 |
| Total/year | €8867 | €7950 |
| Reliability | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | Tesla Model S Plaid | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4725 mm | 5021 mm |
| Width | 1985 mm | 1987 mm |
| Height | 1360 mm | 1431 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2630 mm | 2960 mm |
| Weight | 2000 kg | 2162 kg |
| Trunk (seats up) | 382 L | 793 L |
| Fuel tank | 80 L | — |
Practical summary based on the two chosen models
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE: Performance and luxury
Tesla Model S Plaid: Daily use
AWD vs AWD
4 vs 5
Tesla Model S Plaid saves ~€2312/year in fuel (15,000 km).
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE costs €50.010 more in purchase price.
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE: €3900/year · Tesla Model S Plaid: €2350/year (without fuel).
Detailed comparison between Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE and Tesla Model S Plaid.
| Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | Tesla Model S Plaid | |
|---|---|---|
| City | 14.5 L/100km | 17 kWh/100km |
| Highway | 9.5 L/100km | 14.5 kWh/100km |
| Combined | 11.5 L/100km | 15.7 kWh/100km |
| Calm driving | 10 L/100km | 14 kWh/100km |
| Sport driving | 18 L/100km | 22 kWh/100km |
| City range | 552 km | 520 km |
| Highway range | 842 km | 680 km |
| Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | Tesla Model S Plaid | |
|---|---|---|
| After 1 year | €144.000 (80%) | €103.992 (80%) |
| After 3 years | €122.400 (68%) | €88.393 (68%) |
| After 5 years | €97.200 (54%) | €70.195 (54%) |
56-inch screen that blends instrument, central and passenger displays under a curved glass.
Integrated lateral support and electric adjustments with memory, heating and ventilation.
15-speaker high-fidelity surround sound system.
17-inch horizontal touchscreen with 2200x1300 pixels controlling nearly all car functions.
Ventilated seats with 12-way electric adjustment and vegan finishes.
Clean design without conventional instrument cluster; all info is shown on the center screen.
Panoramic glass roof that increases the sense of space and natural light.
AMD Ryzen processor capable of AAA gaming on the center screen.
Climate control with HEPA filter and three independent zones.
Cameras, radar and ultrasonic sensors for highway assist and manoeuvres.
delivers 1020 HP and estimated total cost €3057/year (fuel + insurance + maintenance).
View full review
Stay up to date with the latest news about Tesla Model S Plaid: launches, updates, market trends and expert analysis.
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE usually has better long-term mechanical reliability.
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE consumes less fuel than the Tesla Model S Plaid.
Tesla Model S Plaid is more comfortable for long trips.
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE vs Tesla Model S Plaid: comparison of power, acceleration, price and fuel economy to help you decide.
