COMPARISON
Full comparison of Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE and Porsche 911 Turbo S: specifications, prices, performance and verdict.
| Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | Porsche 911 Turbo S | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 831 HP | 711 PS |
| Torque | 1400 Nm | 800 Nm |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9 s | 2.5 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h | 322 km/h |
| Price | 180.000 EUR | 245.000 EUR |
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| CO2 (WLTP) | 265 g/km | 266 g/km |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Trunk | 382 L | 132 L |
| Reliability | 8/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Battery | 14.8 kWh | — |
| Electric range | 40 km | — |
| Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | Porsche 911 Turbo S | |
|---|---|---|
| Insurance | €2700 | €4500 |
| MOT | €1167 | €1167 |
| Maintenance | €1200 | €800 |
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel/year | €3019 | €3098 |
| Total/year | €8867 | €10.067 |
| Reliability | 8/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | Porsche 911 Turbo S | |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4725 mm | 4553 mm |
| Width | 1985 mm | 1900 mm |
| Height | 1360 mm | 1302 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2630 mm | 2450 mm |
| Weight | 2000 kg | 1660 kg |
| Trunk (seats up) | 382 L | 132 L |
| Fuel tank | 80 L | 67 L |
Practical summary based on the two chosen models
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE: Performance and luxury
Porsche 911 Turbo S: Performance and luxury
AWD vs AWD
4 vs 4
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE saves ~€79/year in fuel (15,000 km).
Porsche 911 Turbo S costs €65.000 more in purchase price.
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE: €3900/year · Porsche 911 Turbo S: €5300/year (without fuel).
Detailed comparison between Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE and Porsche 911 Turbo S.
| Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | Porsche 911 Turbo S | |
|---|---|---|
| City | 14.5 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
| Highway | 9.5 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Combined | 11.5 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Calm driving | 10 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
| Sport driving | 18 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
| City range | 552 km | 496 km |
| Highway range | 842 km | 684 km |
| Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE | Porsche 911 Turbo S | |
|---|---|---|
| After 1 year | €144.000 (80%) | €196.000 (80%) |
| After 3 years | €122.400 (68%) | €166.600 (68%) |
| After 5 years | €97.200 (54%) | €132.300 (54%) |
56-inch screen that blends instrument, central and passenger displays under a curved glass.
Integrated lateral support and electric adjustments with memory, heating and ventilation.
15-speaker high-fidelity surround sound system.
18 adjustments, heating, ventilation and optional massage.
Curved digital display with classic central tachometer instrumentation.
Sport steering wheel with metal paddles and Sport Response mode.
delivers 831 HP and estimated total cost €6919/year (fuel + insurance + maintenance).
View full review
Stay up to date with the latest news about Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE: launches, updates, market trends and expert analysis.
Porsche 911 Turbo S usually has better long-term mechanical reliability.
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE consumes less fuel than the Porsche 911 Turbo S.
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE is more comfortable for long trips.
Mercedes-AMG GT 63 S E PERFORMANCE vs Porsche 911 Turbo S: comparison of power, acceleration, price and fuel economy to help you decide.
